EHORSE, LLC ENTITY CREATION DATE IS 05/14/1999.
JPC ENTERPRISES, LLC ENTITY CREATION DATE IS 10/06/1999.
EHORSE AND JPC WERE CREATED WITHIN FIVE(5) MONTHS OF EACH OTHER IN 1999.
AS OF TODAY ,THEY BOTH ARE STILL ACTIVE COMPANIES WITH DENISE COLE THE REGISTERED AGENT LISTED ON BOTH.
BUT NOTICE THAT WHEN JPC ENTERPRISES WAS INCORPORATED IN 1999 IT HAS JOHN P. COLE LISTED AS THE REGISTERED AGENT.
SUBSEQUENT TO THIS YEAR IT WAS CHANGED/SWITCHED TO DENISE COLE.
ASK YOURSELF WHY WOULD A PERSON WHO NAMES A COMPANY AFTER HIMSELF(JPC), NO LESS ANY COMPANY NAME--SWITCH OVER THE REGISTRATION OF SAID COMPANY TO HIS SPOUSE?
LAWYERS CALL IT REDUCED LIABILITY, "ONE-STEP REMOVED", "BUFFERING"--BUT THE MOST EVIDENT REASON, WHICH SHALL BE SHOWN --IS THAT ONCE JOHN COLE "TRANSFERRED" THE REGISTRATION TO HIS SPOUSE, DENISE COLE, --JOHN COLE COULD THEN SAY "WELL, I'M NOT THE AGENT FOR THE COMPANY SO WHATEVER GOES ON I REALLY DO NOT HAVE TO ACCOUNT FOR"...... IN PLAIN ENGLISH THIS IS CALLED BULLSHIT AND IN LEGAL TERMS IT'S CALLED ILLEGAL CO-MINGLING OF FUNDS DERIVED FROM SAID BUSINESS. WHAT WRONG WITH IT YOU ASK?
NOTHING, IF EVERYTHING IN BUSINESS WAS PERFORMED ACCORDING TO THE LAW.
EVERYTHING --IF BOTH, LET ALONE ONE OF THE BUSINESSES, WAS INVOLVED IN CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.
PLEASE --NOW ASK YOURSELF THESE QUESTIONS:
WHY WOULD EHORSE AND JPC BE INCORPORATED WITHIN MONTHS OF EACH OTHER WITH JPC AFTER EHORSE?
WHAT IS THE FINANCIAL HISTORY OF EHORSE AND JPC AS STATED ON THEIR TAX RETURNS
WAS THERE EVER A "EXCHANGE" OF MONEY BETWEEN THESE TWO COMPANIES
IF NOT, THEN WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF KEEPING JPC ACTIVE TILL THIS VERY DAY.
WHO WAS ON THE PAYROLL ALL THESE YEARS(ABOUT 7.5 ) FOR EACH COMPANY?
DID THEY "SHARE" EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING THE SPOUSES?
HOW MUCH INCOME DID/DOES EACH COMPANY REPORT TO THE IRS EACH YEAR SINCE THEIR RESPECTIVE INCEPTION DATES?
IS THE ORGANIZER FOR JPC, MR. BEARDSLEY, ESQ., INVOLVED IN ANY WAY WITH EHORSE BEYOND "JUST" BEING THE "ORGANIZER"
HAS HE, AS AN ATTORNEY, BROKEN ANY LAWS KNOWINGLY IN THE PAST 7 PLUS YEARS AND SINCE HE WORKED FOR A LARGE FIRM AT THE TIME OF INCORPORATION THEY AMY BE ACCOMPLICES NAMED, IF SAID ATTORNEY WAS INVOLVED AND/OR KNEW OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY OF EITHER OR BOTH COMPANIES HE HIMSELF INCORPORATED.
DENISE COLE AND JOHN COLE HAVE WORKED OUT AN ELABORATE PLOT TO DEFRAUD THE US. GOVERMENT AND THE GEORGIA DEPT. OF TAXATION MILLIONS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR BY USING FOREIGN NATIONS/CITIES WITH THEIR ONLINE SPORTS GAMBLING AND "BANKING" AND USING FOREIGN DOMAINS ---AS THE ULTIMATE MONEY "LANDING POINT" AND THE CO-MINGLING OF FUNDS THROUGH THEIR 7 PLUS BUSINESS HISTORY OF EHORSE AND JPC.
EHORSE, AS SHOWN, IS A MULTI, MULTI -MILLION DOLLAR PER ANUM ONLINE SPORTS GAMBLING EMPIRE AND "BANKING" SCHEME USING FOREIGN COUNTRIES AS IT'S ULTIMATE "MONEY DEPOT". FURTHERMORE, EHORSE "USES" A THIRD PARTY INTERNATIONAL VENDOR TO EXCHANGE PESOS FOR DOLLARS, ETC.
JPC ENTERPRISES INTERMINGLES "FUNDS" WITH EHORSE IN THESE "VENTURES"--USING THE FOREIGN CITIES AS AN ULTIMATE ILLEGAL TAX HAVEN(CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S. GOV)WITH THE FULL COMPLICITY OF JOHN P. COLE M.D. AND DENISE COLE.
DENISE COLE CAN RIDE AND ALL SHE WANTS AND WEAR HER FANCY OUTFITS IN EQUESTRIAN CONTESTS. IT'S TIME FOR SOMEONE, LEGALLY, TO KNOCK HER AND HER SPOUSE OFF THEIR RESPECTIVE HORSES.
ON A DIFFERENT NOTE, HOW IS IT POSSIBLE --SINCE M. TRUETT BRIDGES HAS NOT HAD A LICENSE TO PRACTICE IN OVER THREE(3) YEARS--THAT HE CAN AFFORD TO PAY THE HOURLY FEE OF ROY BARNES, ESQ.? HOW IS IT THAT SINCE HIS LICENSE WAS REVOKED IN FEB, 2005 HIS TAX RETURNS SHOW HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS. OF COURSE, BRIDGES LAWYERS CAN AND WILL SAY, DEPENDING IF HE FILED JOINTLY OR SEPARATELY WITH HIS SPOUSE JOAN, THAT SHE MADE THE MOST OF BREAD---WHICH IS FINE AND DANDY--I JUST WANT TO SEE THE WEEKLY PAYCHECK THAT M. TRUETT BRIDGES JR. WAS GETTING FROM PHYSICIANS HAIR TRANSPLANT SERVICES, INC AKA IHTI. WHY WAS IT BRIDGES WAS PAID SO MUCH MORE THAN OTHERS? AFTER ALL, ACCORDING TO COLE TELLING THIS TO ME 2 YEARS AFTER MY SURGERY--NOTHING WAS DONE WRONG AND COLE KNEW BRIDGES HAD HIS LICENSE REVOKED. SO WHY WAS BRIDGES PAID SO MUCH MORE THAN THE OTHER NON-LICENSED PERSONEL WHO WORKED AS MANY HOURS? WHY WAS BRIDGES ALSO PAID BY OTHER COMPANIES? HOW IS IT THAT..................SO MANY OTHER THINGS.
