THE TOP POST/IMAGE WAS WRITTEN BY COLE AND POSTED ON HIS WEBSITE THORUGHTOUT 2005, 2006 AND PART OF 2007.
THE BOTTOM POST/IMAGE WAS WRITTEN BY TRUETT BRIDGES TWO(2) YEARS LATER.
THE TOP IMAGE CLEARLY STATES AS PER COLE, THAT 6O HAIRS/PER SQ.CM IS NOT ONLY VIABLE, BUT CAN BE DONE ON CONSECUTIVE DAYS AND CAN STAND ALONE AS A COSMETIC IMPROVEMENT.
2 YEARS LATES, TRUETT BRIDGES, POSTS AS FIT2BTIED, THE OPPOSITE.
TO MAKE MATTERS EVEN WORSE, TRUETT, IS "ONLY" POSTING ABOUT SCALP HAIR DENSITIES WHILE COLE, 2 YEARS EARLIER, IS BOASTING THAT BODY HAIR CAN EXCEED 60 HAIR SQ.COM.
COLE , AS WE KNOW BY NOW, CONSIDERS BHT NON-EXPERIMENTAL IN THE ABOVE POST, BUT ALL THE DISCLAIMERS HE HAS YOU INTIAL/SIGN RIGHT BEFORE SURGERY STATE THE CONTRARY.
IF SCALP HAIR, ACCORDING TO THE NON-LICENSED BRIDGES YIELDS BETTER RESULTS AT LOW DENSITIES, THEN WHAT THE FUCK IS COLE POSTING THAT DENSE PACKING AT 60 OR ABOVE IS VIABLE.
READ THE IMAGES BY CLICKING ON THEM.
ONCE AGAIN, WHEN I HAD MY SURGERIES FOR 15 DATES AND 12000 BODY SKIN HAIR GRAFTS, I PREMISED AND COLE PROMISED TO ME THAT IS WAS NOT ONLY DOABLE, BUT HOW MORE THICKER AND DENSE MY HAIR WILL BE IN LESS THAN A YEAR.
BRIDGES, POSTING ONLY ON SCALP HAIR, IS STATING THE EXACT OPPOSITE!
THE LOWER THE DENSITY, THE HIGHER THE YIELD.
SO WHEN COLE POSTED "WE HAVE NEVER CONSIDERED BHT EXPERIMANTAL" -- HE WAS LYING AND PUTTING FORTH TO THE PUBLIC FALSE UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS WITH NO SUTIDIES TO PROVE HIS CLAIM(S) ABOUT BHT AND SUBSEQUENT DENSITY.
COLE IS A LYING, DECPEPTIVE PSYCHOPATH.
