MY FULL REPLY TO DR. ROSE

PLEASE WATCH FOR IT.

SOME KEYWORDS/NAMES/OTHER THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR DR. ROSE :
A) DAMIEN CHRISTIAN

B) OMISSION BY ROSE THAT COLE IS A SENIOR CONTRIBUTING EDITOR TO YOUR OWN PUBLICATION

C) HOW WOULD YOU KNOW THE NAME OF COLE'S COMPUTER/IT PERSON AND HOW DOES IT/WOULD IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE IF HE IS ISRAELI AND/OR JEWISH? SAME THING APPLIES TO YOU.

D)YOU WRITE " I HAVE NOT SPOKEN TO COLE IN QUITE ALONG TIME"
BE SPECIFIC--GIVE THE AMOUNT OF YEARS.

E) YOU DON'T PRACTICE LAW FOR A GOOD REASON.

F) WHY DON'T YOU HIRE "DR" BRIDGES, THE DRUG-ADDICT TERMINATED "DR", WHOM YOU STILL FREFER TO "DR", FOR A 5-10 YEAR STINT IN YOUR OFFICE AND TELL ALL YOUR PATIENTS ABOUT HIS WONDERFUL IMPAIRED, DRUG DIVERTED HISTORY? AT LEAST, AT THE VERY MINIMUM, THEY WOULD BE INFORMED, UNLIKE MYSELF BY COLE.

G) INVITE ME AS A LECTURER TO THE NEXT MEETING OF YOUR LLUSTRIOUS ORGANIZATION.

DR. ROSE, DON'T PUSH THE ENVELOPE TO FAR.

ALL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTS ON THIS BLOG ARE THE TRUTH.

IF YOU WANT TO COVER-UP FOR YOUR FRIEND, GO AHEAD.

THE FACT YOU SAY YOU DON'T PRACTICE LAW IS LUDICROUS. I BET IF BRIDGES WAS ON YOUR STAFF, YOU WOULDN'T DARE MAKE THAT STATEMENT.

COMMENT AS YOU WILL, ROSE.

I WILL REBUT AND REFUTE YOU.

DAMIEN CHRISTIAN, WHO WORKED FOR DR. COLE ON COMMISSION--DID HE EVER WORK FOR YOU AFTER HE QUIT/WAS FIRED?

PUSH ME ROSE AND I PUSH RIGHT BACK.

THE VERY FACT THAT YOU ARE COLE'S MOUTHPIECE, AS OPPOSED TO COLE RESONDING DIRECTLY--SPEAKS VOLUMES OF THE INCESTUOUS MEDICAL NATURE AND BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YOU AND COLE--THE MAN, YOU WRITE, YOU HAVE NOT SPOKEN TO IN QUITE A WHILE. AMAZING.

LET'S LOOK AT YOUR TELEPHONE LOGS.

YES OR NO?